linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: display: Document NewVision NV3052C DT node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 21:24:52 +0200
From:   Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
        od@...c.me, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: display: Document NewVision NV3052C DT node

On Monday, 27 July 2020 21:10:52 CEST Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > +description: |
> > +  This is a driver for 320x240 TFT panels,
> 
> The binding describes the HW, not the driver. So please re-phrase this
> part.
> 
> This datasheet:
> https://www.phoenixdisplay.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/NV3052C-Dat
> asheet-V0.2.pdf tells that the driver supports additional resoltions.
> I guess the 320x240 resolution is limited to the leadtek panel.

The word "driver" is overloaded ;)

I guess "driver IC" would make it clearer.

Bye,
		Maarten