linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] interconnect: qcom: Implement xlate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200727201955.GF3191083@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:19:55 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        sibis@...eaurora.org, dianders@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] interconnect: qcom: Implement xlate_extended() to
 parse tags

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 04:09:38PM +0300, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> Implement a function to parse the arguments of the "interconnects" DT
> property and populate the interconnect path tags if this information
> is available.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
> index 3ac5182c9ab2..44144fabec32 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
>  #include <linux/interconnect.h>
>  #include <linux/interconnect-provider.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  #include "bcm-voter.h"
>  #include "icc-rpmh.h"
> @@ -92,6 +94,31 @@ int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_icc_set);
>  
> +struct icc_node_data *qcom_icc_xlate_extended(struct of_phandle_args *spec, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct icc_node_data *ndata;
> +	struct icc_node *node;
> +
> +	if (!spec)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	node = of_icc_xlate_onecell(spec, data);
> +	if (IS_ERR(node))
> +		return ERR_CAST(node);
> +
> +	ndata = kzalloc(sizeof(*ndata), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ndata)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	ndata->node = node;
> +
> +	if (spec->args_count == 2)
> +		ndata->tag = spec->args[1];

Would a higher number of arguments (currently) be an error? Is so,
should it be reported?