[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200727202657.GA18997@ninjato>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 22:26:57 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Cc: Dhananjay Phadke <dphadke@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: iproc: fix race between client unreg and isr
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:13:46PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > Can you confirm that even if we have irq pending at the i2c IP core
> > level, as long as we execute Step 2. below (to disable/mask all slave
> > interrupts), after 'enable_irq' is called, we still will not receive any
> > further i2c slave interrupt?
>
> This is HW dependant. From my tests with Renesas HW, this is not the
> case. But the actual error case was impossible to trigger for me, so
> far. I might try again later. But even in the worst case, I would only
> get a "spurious interrupt" and not an NULL-ptr OOPS.
Let me explain how I verified this:
0) add a debug print whenever the slave irq part is called
1) Put a 2 second delay after disable_irq() and before clearing
interrupt enable register
2) unbind the slave driver in the background, triggering the 2s delay
3) during the delay, try to read from the to-be-unbound slave in the
foreground
4) ensure there is no prinout from the slave irq
Worked fine for me with the Renesas R-Car I2C IP interface. As mentioned
before, I couldn't trigger a bad case with my setup. So, I hope this new
fix will work for Rayagonda's test case, too!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists