linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00892cf87c3da679d76c4632109ebcf21059d556.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:58:16 +0200
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        "open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)" 
        <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset
 controller

Hi Jim,

On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 16:33 -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> From: Jim Quinlan <jquinlan@...adcom.com>
> 
> A reset controller "rescal" is shared between the AHCI driver and the PCIe
> driver for the BrcmSTB 7216 chip.  Use
> devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared() to handle this sharing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jquinlan@...adcom.com>
> 
> Fixes: 272ecd60a636 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7216 reset is self de-asserting")
> Fixes: c345ec6a50e9 ("ata: ahci_brcm: Support BCM7216 reset controller name")
> ---
>  drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c | 11 +++--------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
> index 6853dbb4131d..d6115bc04b09 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c
> @@ -428,7 +428,6 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -	const char *reset_name = NULL;
>  	struct brcm_ahci_priv *priv;
>  	struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv;
>  	struct resource *res;
> @@ -452,11 +451,10 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	/* Reset is optional depending on platform and named differently */
>  	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
> -		reset_name = "rescal";
> +		priv->rcdev = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(&pdev->dev, "rescal");
>  	else
> -		reset_name = "ahci";
> +		priv->rcdev = devm_reset_control_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "ahci");

Please use devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() here.

>  
> -	priv->rcdev = devm_reset_control_get_optional(&pdev->dev, reset_name);
>  	if (IS_ERR(priv->rcdev))
>  		return PTR_ERR(priv->rcdev);
>  
> @@ -479,10 +477,7 @@ static int brcm_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (priv->version == BRCM_SATA_BCM7216)
> -		ret = reset_control_reset(priv->rcdev);
> -	else
> -		ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev);
> +	ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->rcdev);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  

Since you switch from _reset to _deassert/_assert here, I suspect you
should also change the out_reset error path, and the suspend/resume
functions accordingly.

regards
Philipp