[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUBQa=L_Chd=RAPDEihvUWC_9KoHG00zYsGOwiYg87naQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:39:01 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Keno Fischer <keno@...iacomputing.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 04/15] entry: Provide generic interrupt entry/exit code
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 4:08 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Like the syscall entry/exit code interrupt/exception entry after the real
> low level ASM bits should not be different accross architectures.
>
> Provide a generic version based on the x86 code.
I don't like the name. Sure, idtentry is ugly and x86-specific, but
irq gives the wrong impression. This is an entry path suitable for
any entry that is guaranteed not to hit during entry/exit handling.
Syscalls, page faults, etc are not "irqs".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists