lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8048e2c6-8c2d-f41e-972b-9f4730aa6726@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:09:21 -0500
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/kernel-doc: optionally treat warnings as errors

Thank Jon for the feedback,

>> The kbuild bot recently added the W=1 option, which triggered
>> documentation cleanups to squelch hundreds of kernel-doc warnings.
>>
>> To make sure new kernel contributions don't add regressions to
>> kernel-doc descriptors, this patch suggests an option to treat
>> warnings as errors in CI/automated tests. A command-line option is
>> provided to the kernel-doc script, as well as a check on environment
>> variables to turn this optional behavior on.
>>
>> Examples for the two subsystems I contribute to:
>>
>> KCFLAGS="-Wall -Werror" make W=1 sound/
>> KCFLAGS="-Wall -Werror" make W=1 drivers/soundwire/
>>
>> Randy Dunlap also suggested adding a log for when generating
>> documentation. The documentation build is however not stopped for now.
>>
>> KDOC_WERROR=1 make htmldocs
> 
> So I'm not opposed to this, but I'm missing a couple of things in the
> changelog:
> 
>   - A statement that you are adding a -Werror option that invokes this
>     behavior.
> 
>   - Mention of the fact that you also cause it to look at a couple of
>     environment variables and change its behavior based on that.
> 
> Could I get a version with that clarified a bit?

Both points were covered by the sentence "A command-line option is
provided to the kernel-doc script, as well as a check on environment
variables to turn this optional behavior on".

I can try and make this clearer, maybe by moving this sentence to the 
start of a new paragraph?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ