linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period with u64 data length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:29:19 +0200
From:   Martin Botka <martin.botka1@...il.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@...eaurora.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period
 with u64 data length

Hello Uwe,

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:12:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote:
>> > Note there is already a series that changes these values to u64. See
>> > a9d887dc1c60ed67f2271d66560cdcf864c4a578 in linux-next.
>>
>> Amazing. But isn't there the same issue with it as this one where this
>> would fail to build on 32 bit architecture?
>
> In theory all these cases are coped for. I didn't see any problems yet,
> so I still assume also the 32 bit archs are fine.

OK then all is fine. I will drop the patch in V2.

Also Uwe i just realized that you sent the original message and also
this reply only to me and not to anyone else.
Could you please send the messages also to everyone else ?

Thank you.

Best regards,
Martin