linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] dmaengine: dw: Take Baikal-T1 SoC DW DMAC peculiarities into account

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:31:14 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] dmaengine: dw: Take Baikal-T1 SoC DW DMAC
 peculiarities into account

On 23-07-20, 03:58, Serge Semin wrote:
> In the previous patchset I've written the next message:
> 
> > Folks, note I've removed the next patches from the series:
> > [PATCH v7 04/11] dmaengine: Introduce max SG list entries capability
> > [PATCH v7 11/11] dmaengine: dw: Initialize max_sg_nents capability
> > It turns out the problem with the asynchronous handling of Tx- and Rx-
> > SPI transfers interrupts is more complex than I expected. So in order to
> > solve the problem it isn't enough to split the SG list entries submission
> > up based on the max_sg_nents capability setting (though the synchronous
> > one-by-one SG list entries handling does fix a part of the problem). So
> > if and when I get to find a comprehensive solution for it I'll submit a
> > new series with fixups. Until then please consider to merge the patchset
> > in without those patches.
> 
> Those patches are returned back to the series. I've found a solution, which
> fixes the problem for our hardware. A new patchset with several fixes for the
> DW DMAC driver will be sent shortly after this one is merged in. Note the same
> concerns the DW APB SPI driver. So please review and merge in as soon as
> possible.
> 
> Regarding the patchset. Baikal-T1 SoC has an DW DMAC on-board to provide a
> Mem-to-Mem, low-speed peripherals Dev-to-Mem and Mem-to-Dev functionality.
> Mostly it's compatible with currently implemented in the kernel DW DMAC
> driver, but there are some peculiarities which must be taken into account
> in order to have the device fully supported.
> 
> First of all traditionally we replaced the legacy plain text-based dt-binding
> file with yaml-based one. Secondly Baikal-T1 DW DMA Controller provides eight
> channels, which alas have different max burst length configuration.
> In particular first two channels may burst up to 128 bits (16 bytes) at a time
> while the rest of them just up to 32 bits. We must make sure that the DMA
> subsystem doesn't set values exceeding these limitations otherwise the
> controller will hang up. In third currently we discovered the problem in using
> the DW APB SPI driver together with DW DMAC. The problem happens if there is no
> natively implemented multi-block LLP transfers support and the SPI-transfer
> length exceeds the max lock size. In this case due to asynchronous handling of
> Tx- and Rx- SPI transfers interrupt we might end up with DW APB SSI Rx FIFO
> overflow. So if DW APB SSI (or any other DMAC service consumer) intends to use
> the DMAC to asynchronously execute the transfers we'd have to at least warn
> the user of the possible errors. In forth it's worth to set the DMA device max
> segment size with max block size config specific to the DW DMA controller. It
> shall help the DMA clients to create size-optimized SG-list items for the
> controller. This in turn will cause less dw_desc allocations, less LLP
> reinitializations, better DMA device performance.
> 
> Finally there is a bug in the algorithm of the nollp flag detection.
> In particular even if DW DMAC parameters state the multi-block transfers
> support there is still HC_LLP (hardcode LLP) flag, which if set makes expected
> by the driver true multi-block LLP functionality unusable. This happens cause'
> if HC_LLP flag is set the LLP registers will be hardcoded to zero so the
> contiguous multi-block transfers will be only supported. We must take the
> flag into account when detecting the LLP support otherwise the driver just
> won't work correctly.

Applied all, thanks
-- 
~Vinod