[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200727102024.00005f8b@Huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:20:24 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Andrew Maier <andrew.maier@...eticom.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Eric Wehage <Eric.Wehage@...urewei.com>,
"Alex Umansky" <alex.umansky@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/P2PDMA: Add AMD Zen 2 root complex to the list of
allowed bridges
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:56:39 -0600
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
> [+cc Jonathan]
>
> On 2020-07-24 9:06 a.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:10:52PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >> On 2020-07-23 1:57 p.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:01:17PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:43 PM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The AMD Zen 2 root complex (Starship/Matisse) was tested for P2PDMA
> >>>>> transactions between root ports and found to work. Therefore add it
> >>>>> to the list.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> >>>>> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> >>>>> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> >>>>> Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> >>>>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Starting with Zen, all AMD platforms support P2P for reads and writes.
> >>>
> >>> What's the plan for getting out of the cycle of "update this list for
> >>> every new chip"? Any new _DSMs planned, for instance?
> >>
> >> Well there was an effort to add capabilities in the PCI spec to describe
> >> this but, as far as I know, they never got anywhere, and hardware still
> >> doesn't self describe with this.
> >
> > Any idea what happened? Is there hope for the future? I'm really not
> > happy about signing up for open-ended device-specific patches like
> > this. It's certainly not in the plug and play spirit that has made
> > PCI successful. I know, preaching to the choir here.
>
> Agreed, though I'm not really hooked into the PCI SIG. The last email I
> got about this was an RFC from Jonathan Cameron in late 2018. I've CC'd
> him here, maybe he'll have a bit more insight.
For non technical reasons, you can probably figure out, that particular
ECR stalled. Unfortunately I can't directly provide info on any newer
discussions. Eric, could you perhaps find out if there is anything we can share?
This is the same question of trying to find a way to avoid white listing
root complexes that can do peer 2 peer that would have been covered by
your Advanced Peer to Peer Capabilities ECR.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists