linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] USB: PHY: JZ4770: Add support for new Ingenic SoCs.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200727095115.GV12965@vkoul-mobl>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:21:15 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc:     周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) 
        <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        paul@...pouillou.net, prasannatsmkumar@...il.com, kishon@...com,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
        christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, dongsheng.qiu@...enic.com,
        aric.pzqi@...enic.com, rick.tyliu@...enic.com,
        yanfei.li@...enic.com, sernia.zhou@...mail.com,
        zhenwenjin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] USB: PHY: JZ4770: Add support for new Ingenic
 SoCs.

On 25-07-20, 09:16, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com> writes:
> > Add support for probing the phy-jz4770 driver on the JZ4780 SoC,
> > the X1000 SoC and the X1830 SoC from Ingenic.
> >
> > Tested-by: 周正 (Zhou Zheng) <sernia.zhou@...mail.com>
> > Co-developed-by: 漆鹏振 (Qi Pengzhen) <aric.pzqi@...enic.com>
> > Signed-off-by: 漆鹏振 (Qi Pengzhen) <aric.pzqi@...enic.com>
> > Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
> 
> It would be better to move this driver to drivers/phy before adding
> support for new SoCs. We want to remove drivers/usb/phy/ in the near
> future, any help is welcome.

Yeah I was about to ask why should this patch up drivers/usb/phy/ rather
than move to drivers/phy, thanks for confirming that :)

Looking forward to move

-- 
~Vinod