[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2A0D15F3-BAF2-47CE-AF5F-DB681793D07D@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 05:47:32 -0700
From: hpa@...or.com
To: peterz@...radead.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Cathy Zhang <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Kyung Min Park <kyung.min.park@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/cpu: Use SERIALIZE in sync_core() when available
On July 27, 2020 1:20:03 AM PDT, peterz@...radead.org wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 09:31:32PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
>> +static inline void serialize(void)
>> +{
>> + asm volatile(".byte 0xf, 0x1, 0xe8");
>> +}
>
>Can we pretty please have a comment with the binutils version that has
>the mnomic? Such that when we increase the required binutils version we
>can grep for this.
It also needs : : : "memory" to be a barrier.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists