[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871rkxcc31.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:38:26 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry: Consolidate 32/64 bit syscall entry
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 4:14 PM tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
>>
>> -static bool __do_fast_syscall_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +static noinstr bool __do_fast_syscall_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> Can __do_fast_syscall_32() be merged back into do_fast_syscall_32()
> now that both are marked noinstr?
It could.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists