linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] powerpc/smp: Create coregroup domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200727043941.GA18303@in.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:09:41 +0530
From:   Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>,
        "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
        Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
        Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] powerpc/smp: Create coregroup domain

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:21:15PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Add percpu coregroup maps and masks to create coregroup domain.
> If a coregroup doesn't exist, the coregroup domain will be degenerated
> in favour of SMT/CACHE domain.
> 
> Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>
> Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>
> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> Cc: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog v2 -> v3:
> 	Add optimization for mask updation under coregroup_support
> 
> Changelog v1 -> v2:
> 	Moved coregroup topology fixup to fixup_topology (Gautham)
> 
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h | 10 +++++++
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c           | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c              |  5 ++++
>  3 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> index f0b6300e7dd3..6609174918ab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -88,12 +88,22 @@ static inline int cpu_distance(__be32 *cpu1_assoc, __be32 *cpu2_assoc)
> 
>  #if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) && defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
>  extern int find_and_online_cpu_nid(int cpu);
> +extern int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu);
>  #else
>  static inline int find_and_online_cpu_nid(int cpu)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static inline int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	return cpu_to_core_id(cpu);
> +#else
> +	return 0;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA && CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR */
> 
>  #include <asm-generic/topology.h>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 7d8d44cbab11..1faedde3e406 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_map);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_smallcore_map);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_l2_cache_map);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_map);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_coregroup_map);
> 
>  EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_sibling_map);
>  EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_l2_cache_map);
> @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ enum {
>  	smt_idx,
>  #endif
>  	bigcore_idx,
> +	mc_idx,
>  	die_idx,
>  };
> 
> @@ -869,6 +871,21 @@ static const struct cpumask *smallcore_smt_mask(int cpu)
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> +static struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> +	return per_cpu(cpu_coregroup_map, cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static bool has_coregroup_support(void)
> +{
> +	return coregroup_enabled;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct cpumask *cpu_mc_mask(int cpu)
> +{
> +	return cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct cpumask *cpu_bigcore_mask(int cpu)
>  {
>  	return per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, cpu);
> @@ -879,6 +896,7 @@ static struct sched_domain_topology_level powerpc_topology[] = {
>  	{ cpu_smt_mask, powerpc_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT) },
>  #endif
>  	{ cpu_bigcore_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(BIGCORE) },
> +	{ cpu_mc_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
>  	{ cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
>  	{ NULL, },
>  };

[..snip..]

> @@ -1384,6 +1425,9 @@ int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
> 
>  static void fixup_topology(void)
>  {
> +	if (!has_coregroup_support())
> +		powerpc_topology[mc_idx].mask = cpu_bigcore_mask;
> +
>  	if (shared_caches) {
>  		pr_info("Using shared cache scheduler topology\n");
>  		powerpc_topology[bigcore_idx].mask = shared_cache_mask;


Suppose we consider a topology which does not have coregroup_support,
but has shared_caches. In that case, we would want our coregroup
domain to degenerate.

>From the above code, after the fixup, our topology will look as
follows:

static struct sched_domain_topology_level powerpc_topology[] = {
  	{ cpu_smt_mask, powerpc_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT) },
 	{ shared_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CACHE) },
	{ cpu_bigcore_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(MC) },
  	{ cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) },
  	{ NULL, },

So, in this case, the core-group domain (identified by MC) will
degenerate only if cpu_bigcore_mask() and shared_cache_mask() return
the same value. This may work for existing platforms, because either
shared_caches don't exist, or when they do, cpu_bigcore_mask and
shared_cache_mask return the same set of CPUs. But this may or may not
continue to hold good in the future.

Furthermore, if that is always going to be the case that in the
presence of shared_caches the cpu_bigcore_mask() and
shared_cache_mask() will always be the same, then why even define two
separate masks and not just have only the cpu_bigcore_mask() ?

The correct way would be to set the powerpc_topology[mc_idx].mask to
powerpc_topology[bigcore_idx].mask *after* we have fixedup the
big_core level.
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.