linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 043/138] RDMA/mlx5: Use xa_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200727134927.517829514@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:03:58 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 043/138] RDMA/mlx5: Use xa_lock_irq when access to SRQ table

From: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>

[ Upstream commit c3d6057e07a5d15be7c69ea545b3f91877808c96 ]

SRQ table is accessed both from interrupt and process context,
therefore we must use xa_lock_irq.

   inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
   kworker/u17:9/8573   takes:
   ffff8883e3503d30 (&xa->xa_lock#13){?...}-{2:2}, at: mlx5_cmd_get_srq+0x18/0x70 [mlx5_ib]
   {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
     lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3a0
     _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30
     srq_event_notifier+0x2b/0xc0 [mlx5_ib]
     notifier_call_chain+0x45/0x70
     __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x69/0x100
     forward_event+0x36/0xc0 [mlx5_core]
     notifier_call_chain+0x45/0x70
     __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x69/0x100
     mlx5_eq_async_int+0xc5/0x160 [mlx5_core]
     notifier_call_chain+0x45/0x70
     __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x69/0x100
     mlx5_irq_int_handler+0x19/0x30 [mlx5_core]
     __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2a0
     handle_irq_event_percpu+0x30/0x70
     handle_irq_event+0x34/0x60
     handle_edge_irq+0x7c/0x1b0
     do_IRQ+0x60/0x110
     ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2a
     default_idle+0x34/0x160
     do_idle+0x1ec/0x220
     cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20
     start_secondary+0x153/0x1a0
     secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
   irq event stamp: 20907
   hardirqs last  enabled at (20907):   _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30
   hardirqs last disabled at (20906):   _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xf/0x40
   softirqs last  enabled at (20746):   __do_softirq+0x2c9/0x436
   softirqs last disabled at (20681):   irq_exit+0xb3/0xc0

   other info that might help us debug this:
    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0
          ----
     lock(&xa->xa_lock#13);
     <Interrupt>
       lock(&xa->xa_lock#13);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

   2 locks held by kworker/u17:9/8573:
    #0: ffff888295218d38 ((wq_completion)mlx5_ib_page_fault){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f1/0x5f0
    #1: ffff888401647e78 ((work_completion)(&pfault->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1f1/0x5f0

   stack backtrace:
   CPU: 0 PID: 8573 Comm: kworker/u17:9 Tainted: GO      5.7.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2020_06_14_11_31_46_41 #1
   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
   Workqueue: mlx5_ib_page_fault mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action [mlx5_ib]
   Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0x71/0x9b
    mark_lock+0x4f2/0x590
    ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x200/0x200
    __lock_acquire+0xa00/0x1eb0
    lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3a0
    ? mlx5_cmd_get_srq+0x18/0x70 [mlx5_ib]
    _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30
    ? mlx5_cmd_get_srq+0x18/0x70 [mlx5_ib]
    mlx5_cmd_get_srq+0x18/0x70 [mlx5_ib]
    mlx5_ib_eqe_pf_action+0x257/0xa30 [mlx5_ib]
    ? process_one_work+0x209/0x5f0
    process_one_work+0x27b/0x5f0
    ? __schedule+0x280/0x7e0
    worker_thread+0x2d/0x3c0
    ? process_one_work+0x5f0/0x5f0
    kthread+0x111/0x130
    ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
    ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30

Fixes: e126ba97dba9 ("mlx5: Add driver for Mellanox Connect-IB adapters")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200712102641.15210-1-leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/srq_cmd.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/srq_cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/srq_cmd.c
index 8fc3630a9d4c3..0224231a2e6f8 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/srq_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/srq_cmd.c
@@ -83,11 +83,11 @@ struct mlx5_core_srq *mlx5_cmd_get_srq(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u32 srqn)
 	struct mlx5_srq_table *table = &dev->srq_table;
 	struct mlx5_core_srq *srq;
 
-	xa_lock(&table->array);
+	xa_lock_irq(&table->array);
 	srq = xa_load(&table->array, srqn);
 	if (srq)
 		refcount_inc(&srq->common.refcount);
-	xa_unlock(&table->array);
+	xa_unlock_irq(&table->array);
 
 	return srq;
 }
-- 
2.25.1