linux-kernel - [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: return skip code for spectre

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:50:39 -0300
From:   Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cascardo@...onical.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: return skip code for spectre_v2

When running under older versions of qemu of under newer versions with old
machine types, some security features will not be reported to the guest.
This will lead the guest OS to consider itself Vulnerable to spectre_v2.

So, spectre_v2 test fails in such cases when the host is mitigated and miss
predictions cannot be detected as expected by the test.

Make it return the skip code instead, for this particular case. We don't
want to miss the case when the test fails and the system reports as
mitigated or not affected. But it is not a problem to miss failures when
the system reports as Vulnerable.

Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@...onical.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/spectre_v2.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/spectre_v2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/spectre_v2.c
index 8c6b982af2a8..d5445bfd63ed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/spectre_v2.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/security/spectre_v2.c
@@ -183,6 +183,14 @@ int spectre_v2_test(void)
 		if (miss_percent > 15) {
 			printf("Branch misses > 15%% unexpected in this configuration!\n");
 			printf("Possible mis-match between reported & actual mitigation\n");
+			/* Such a mismatch may be caused by a guest system
+			 * reporting as vulnerable when the host is mitigated.
+			 * Return skip code to avoid detecting this as an
+			 * error. We are not vulnerable and reporting otherwise,
+			 * so missing such a mismatch is safe.
+			 */
+			if (state == VULNERABLE)
+				return 4;
 			return 1;
 		}
 		break;
-- 
2.25.1