linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: drop call to wakeup-disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <159595388005.15302.1247752401935651695.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:31:20 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varodek@...il.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@...gaas.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: drop call to wakeup-disable

On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:47:43 +0530, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> Before generic upgrade, both .suspend() and .resume() were invoking
> pci_enable_wake(pci_dev, PCI_D3hot, 0). Hence, disabling wakeup in both
> states. (Normal trend is .suspend() enables and .resume() disables the
> wakeup.)
> 
> This was ambiguous and may be buggy. Instead of replicating the legacy
> behavior, drop the wakeup-disable call.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-topcliff-pch: drop call to wakeup-disable
      commit: 15b413d93ccd0d26c29f005df82c299c8f14cbd6

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark