[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200728180554.65203-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:05:53 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: zhouchengming@...edance.com, songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: setup correct FTRACE_FL_REGS flags for module
When module loaded and enabled, we will use __ftrace_replace_code
for module if any ftrace_ops referenced it found. But we will get
wrong ftrace_addr for module rec in ftrace_get_addr_new, because
rec->flags has not been setup correctly. It can cause the callback
function of a ftrace_ops has FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS to be called
with pt_regs set to NULL.
So setup correct FTRACE_FL_REGS flags for rec when we call
referenced_filters to find ftrace_ops references it.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index fca01a168ae5..a3d141f53c9e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -6190,8 +6190,11 @@ static int referenced_filters(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
int cnt = 0;
for (ops = ftrace_ops_list; ops != &ftrace_list_end; ops = ops->next) {
- if (ops_references_rec(ops, rec))
- cnt++;
+ if (ops_references_rec(ops, rec)) {
+ cnt++;
+ if (ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS)
+ rec->flags |= FTRACE_FL_REGS;
+ }
}
return cnt;
@@ -6372,8 +6375,8 @@ void ftrace_module_enable(struct module *mod)
if (ftrace_start_up)
cnt += referenced_filters(rec);
- /* This clears FTRACE_FL_DISABLED */
- rec->flags = cnt;
+ rec->flags &= ~FTRACE_FL_DISABLED;
+ rec->flags += cnt;
if (ftrace_start_up && cnt) {
int failed = __ftrace_replace_code(rec, 1);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists