[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200728134119.57a54f2a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:41:19 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve Cohen <cohens@...eaurora.org>,
Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
between commit:
8490d6a7e0a0 ("drm: hold gem reference until object is no longer accessed")
from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
be6ee102341b ("drm: remove _unlocked suffix in drm_gem_object_put_unlocked")
from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
index ee2058ad482c,a57f5379fc08..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
@@@ -901,9 -913,7 +909,9 @@@ drm_gem_open_ioctl(struct drm_device *d
args->handle = handle;
args->size = obj->size;
- return 0;
+err:
- drm_gem_object_put_unlocked(obj);
++ drm_gem_object_put(obj);
+ return ret;
}
/**
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists