[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200728002823.GA10290@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:28:23 +0800
From: Tingwei Zhang <tingweiz@...eaurora.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tingwei Zhang <tingwei@...eaurora.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, tsoni@...eaurora.org,
Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
Mao Jinlong <jinlmao@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] stm class: ftrace: use different channel
accroding to CPU
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 03:08:12AM +0800, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:59:31 +0800
> Tingwei Zhang <tingwei@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/ftrace.c
> > @@ -37,8 +37,9 @@ static void notrace
> > stm_ftrace_write(struct trace_export *export, const void *buf, unsigned
> int len)
> > {
> > struct stm_ftrace *stm = container_of(export, struct stm_ftrace,
> ftrace);
> > + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> Probably should add a comment to the above stating that this is called
> from the tracing system with preemption disabled.
>
Good point. I'll add that comment in next revision.
Thanks,
Tingwei
> Other than my two comments:
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> >
> > - stm_source_write(&stm->data, STM_FTRACE_CHAN, buf, len);
> > + stm_source_write(&stm->data, STM_FTRACE_CHAN + cpu, buf, len);
> > }
> >
> > static int stm_ftrace_link(struct stm_source_data *data)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists