linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add OPP tables and power-domains for venus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <159589714088.1360974.13205114501389777927@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:45:40 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mka@...omium.org, Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add OPP tables and power-domains for venus

Quoting Lina Iyer (2020-07-24 09:28:25)
> On Fri, Jul 24 2020 at 03:03 -0600, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> >Hi Maulik/Lina,
> >
> >On 7/23/2020 11:36 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> >>Hi Rajendra,
> >>
> >>After applying 2,3 and 4/5 patches on linaro-integration v5.8-rc2 I see
> >>below messages on db845:
> >>
> >>qcom-venus aa00000.video-codec: dev_pm_opp_set_rate: failed to find
> >>current OPP for freq 533000097 (-34)
> >>
> >>^^^ This one is new.
> >>
> >>qcom_rpmh TCS Busy, retrying RPMH message send: addr=0x30000
> >>
> >>^^^ and this message is annoying, can we make it pr_debug in rpmh?
> >
> How annoyingly often do you see this message?
> Usually, this is an indication of bad system state either on remote
> processors in the SoC or in Linux itself. On a smooth sailing build you
> should not see this 'warning'.
> 
> >Would you be fine with moving this message to a pr_debug? Its currently
> >a pr_info_ratelimited()
> I would rather not, moving this out of sight will mask a lot serious
> issues that otherwise bring attention to the developers.
> 

I removed this warning message in my patch posted to the list[1]. If
it's a serious problem then I suppose a timeout is more appropriate, on
the order of several seconds or so and then a pr_warn() and bail out of
the async call with an error.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724211711.810009-1-sboyd@kernel.org