[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <807b3eec-cc11-dbbf-7d35-0086df12f52b@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:06:54 +0530
From: "Agrawal, Akshu" <aagrawal2@....com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, akshu.agrawal@....com
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 4/4] clk: x86: Support RV architecture
On 7/21/2020 1:35 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Akshu Agrawal (2020-07-19 22:04:59)
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c
>> index b252f0cf0628..d68bca7b213f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-fch.c
> [...]
>>
>> static int fch_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> - int i;
>> + int i, clks;
>> + struct fch_clk_data *fch_data;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ST_MAX_CLKS; i++)
>> + fch_data = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + clks = (!fch_data->is_rv) ? ST_MAX_CLKS : RV_MAX_CLKS;
> Useless parenthesis and negation, just write:
>
> num = fch_data->is_rv ? RV_MAX_CLKS : ST_MAX_CLKS;
Sure, including in the next patch set.
Thanks,
Akshu
>
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < clks; i++)
>> clk_hw_unregister(hws[i]);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists