| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200728072006.6lqia5gssfepnpbq@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:20:06 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] remoteproc: imx: use devm_ioremap
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:11:09AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] remoteproc: imx: use devm_ioremap
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 06:51:00AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] remoteproc: imx: use devm_ioremap
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 06:28:20AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > > Hi Oleksij,
> > > > >
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] remoteproc: imx: use devm_ioremap
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 04:08:06PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > > > > We might need to map an region multiple times, becaue the
> > > > > > > region might be shared between remote processors, such i.MX8QM
> > > > > > > with dual
> > > > M4 cores.
> > > > > > > So use devm_ioremap, not devm_ioremap_resource.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you please give an example of this kind of shared resources
> > > > > > and how they should be handled by two separate devices?
> > > > >
> > > > > This is to share vdevbuffer space, there is a vdevbuffer in device
> > > > > tree, it will be shared between M4_0 and M4_1.
> > > > >
> > > > > For the buffer, it is Linux DMA API will handle the space.
> > > >
> > > > Why remoteproc need to care about it? If I see it correctly, from
> > > > the linux perspective, it is one buffer and one driver is
> > > > responsible for it. Or do I missing some thing?
> > >
> > > We not have the vdev buffer in resource table, so I added in device tree, see
> > below:
> >
> > Hm.. if vdev is not in resource table and should not be controlled by
> > remoteproc, why do we need remoteproc?
>
> I use same approach as stm32 rproc driver.
>
> The resource table here only publish vring address.
>
> >
> > > imx8qm_cm40: imx8qm_cm4@0 {
> > > compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-cm4";
> > > rsc-da = <0x90000000>;
> > > mbox-names = "tx", "rx", "rxdb";
> > > mboxes = <&lsio_mu5 0 1
> > > &lsio_mu5 1 1
> > > &lsio_mu5 3 1>;
> > > mub-partition = <3>;
> > > memory-region = <&vdev0vring0>, <&vdev0vring1>,
> > <&vdevbuffer>,
> > > <&vdev1vring0>, <&vdev1vring1>;
> > > core-index = <0>;
> > > core-id = <IMX_SC_R_M4_0_PID0>;
> > > status = "okay";
> > > power-domains = <&pd IMX_SC_R_M4_0_PID0>,
> > > <&pd IMX_SC_R_M4_0_MU_1A>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > imx8qm_cm41: imx8x_cm4@1 {
> > > compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-cm4";
> > > rsc-da = <0x90100000>;
> > > mbox-names = "tx", "rx", "rxdb";
> > > mboxes = <&lsio_mu6 0 1
> > > &lsio_mu6 1 1
> > > &lsio_mu6 3 1>;
> > > mub-partition = <4>;
> > > memory-region = <&vdev2vring0>, <&vdev2vring1>,
> > <&vdevbuffer>,
> > > <&vdev3vring0>, <&vdev3vring1>;
> > > core-index = <1>;
> > > core-id = <IMX_SC_R_M4_1_PID0>;
> > > status = "okay";
> > > power-domains = <&pd IMX_SC_R_M4_1_PID0>,
> > > <&pd IMX_SC_R_M4_1_MU_1A>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > vdevbuffer: vdevbuffer {
> > > compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> > > reg = <0 0x90400000 0 0x100000>;
> > > no-map;
> > > };
> > >
> > > I have the upper vdevbuffer node shared between M40 and M41 node.
> > > The vdevbuffer will be used as virtio data buffer.
> > >
> > > And I have the following in rproc_add_virtio_dev to share vdevbuffer:
> > > /* Try to find dedicated vdev buffer carveout */
> > > mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dbuffer",
> > rvdev->index);
> > > if (!mem)
> > > mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc,
> > > "vdevbuffer");
> >
> > With kernel v5.8-rc7 i get following call chain:
>
> Please use Linux-next which has support of M4 booted before Linux in
> in remoteproc.
>
> > rproc_boot()
> > rproc_fw_boot()
> > rproc_handle_vdev
> > rproc_vdev_do_start()
> > rproc_add_virtio_dev()
> >
> >
> > So, at the end, we will call rproc_add_virtio_dev() only if we boot firmware by
> > linux, or if we get at least the resource table.
>
>
> Resource table could be got from elf file if it is booted by Linux, or got from
> an address if M4 is booted before Linux.
Ok, i see now. Thank you!
Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists