linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: berlin: Align L2 cache-controller nodename with dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200728154207.444ec4cc@xhacker.debian>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:42:07 +0800
From:   Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: berlin: Align L2 cache-controller nodename
 with dtschema

On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:33:05 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:


> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:37 AM Jisheng Zhang
> <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi arm-soc,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 10:06:41 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >  
> > >
> > >
> > > Fix dtschema validator warnings like:
> > >     l2-cache-controller@...000: $nodename:0:
> > >         'l2-cache-controller@...000' does not match '^(cache-controller|cpu)(@[0-9a-f,]+)*$'
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>  
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
> >
> > As for berlin linux-5.9, we only have this one patch, could you please
> > directly take this patch?  
> 
> Applied now. To ensure we actually see the patch, it's better if you can just
> send a new copy with your added Signed-off-by to soc@...nel.org than to
> reply to the original email.
> 

Got it. Thanks for the your kind reminding