[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200728014945.GA951209@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 02:49:45 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, x86@...nel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] quota: simplify the quotactl compat handling
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:31:58PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 27-07-20 16:56:16, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 02:41:27PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Sun 26-07-20 18:04:01, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Fold the misaligned u64 workarounds into the main quotactl flow instead
> > > > of implementing a separate compat syscall handler.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > >
> > > The patch looks good to me and it saves a lot of boiler-plate code so feel
> > > free to add:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >
> > Which tree do we put that through? I can grab it into vfs.git, but IIRC usually
> > you put quota-related stuff through yours...
>
> I can take it through quota tree as well but I thought it's not a great fit
> given the generic arch bits which this last patch depends on...
OK, into vfs.git it goes, then...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists