linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] MIPS: ingenic: Enable JZ4780

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <NPJ6EQ.I4K2FZ2BHH1E@crapouillou.net>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:51:23 +0200
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] MIPS: ingenic: Enable JZ4780_NEMC manually



Le mar. 28 juil. 2020 à 14:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> a 
écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:37:02PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>>  On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:19:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>  > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:12:11PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>  > > Hi Krzysztof,
>>  > >
>>  > > Le mar. 28 juil. 2020 à 12:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski 
>> <krzk@...nel.org> a écrit
>>  > > :
>>  > > > The CONFIG_JZ4780_NEMC was previously a default on MIPS but 
>> now it has
>>  > > > to be enabled manually.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>  > >
>>  > > I think you should swap the two so that there are no problems 
>> when
>>  > > bisecting.
>>  >
>>  > Good point. I was thinking that it will go via some of MIPS trees 
>> and
>>  > the patch #1 will just wait a cycle.  However with acks, I can 
>> take it
>>  > through drivers/memory tree.
>> 
>>  I've acked the patch.
>> 
>>  Thomas.
> 
> Thanks but now I noticed that one of changed configs
> (arch/mips/configs/rs90_defconfig) is only in MIPS tree.
> 
> I think it is easier then to take the patch #2 (configs) via MIPS and
> wait with #1 for the next cycle or also take it via MIPS if it applies
> cleanly.

Why not take them both in the MIPS tree then? Would that conflict with 
changes in your tree?

-Paul