linux-kernel - Re: [External] [PATCH 4.19 76/86] mm: memcg/slab: fix memory leak at non-root kmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMZfGtWVtGeMfu=04LiNVcLrBpmexUryHjy-dujo77CpJhcwGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:56:41 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [External] [PATCH 4.19 76/86] mm: memcg/slab: fix memory leak at
 non-root kmem_cache destroy

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:12 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> commit d38a2b7a9c939e6d7329ab92b96559ccebf7b135 upstream.
>
> If the kmem_cache refcount is greater than one, we should not mark the
> root kmem_cache as dying.  If we mark the root kmem_cache dying
> incorrectly, the non-root kmem_cache can never be destroyed.  It
> resulted in memory leak when memcg was destroyed.  We can use the
> following steps to reproduce.
>
>   1) Use kmem_cache_create() to create a new kmem_cache named A.
>   2) Coincidentally, the kmem_cache A is an alias for kmem_cache B,
>      so the refcount of B is just increased.
>   3) Use kmem_cache_destroy() to destroy the kmem_cache A, just
>      decrease the B's refcount but mark the B as dying.
>   4) Create a new memory cgroup and alloc memory from the kmem_cache
>      B. It leads to create a non-root kmem_cache for allocating memory.
>   5) When destroy the memory cgroup created in the step 4), the
>      non-root kmem_cache can never be destroyed.
>
> If we repeat steps 4) and 5), this will cause a lot of memory leak.  So
> only when refcount reach zero, we mark the root kmem_cache as dying.
>
> Fixes: 92ee383f6daa ("mm: fix race between kmem_cache destroy, create and deactivate")
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200716165103.83462-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> ---
>  mm/slab_common.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -310,6 +310,14 @@ int slab_unmergeable(struct kmem_cache *
>         if (s->refcount < 0)
>                 return 1;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> +       /*
> +        * Skip the dying kmem_cache.
> +        */
> +       if (s->memcg_params.dying)
> +               return 1;
> +#endif
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -832,12 +840,15 @@ static int shutdown_memcg_caches(struct
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static void flush_memcg_workqueue(struct kmem_cache *s)
> +static void memcg_set_kmem_cache_dying(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  {
>         mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
>         s->memcg_params.dying = true;
>         mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);

We should remove mutex_lock/unlock(&slab_mutex) here, because
we already hold the slab_mutex from kmem_cache_destroy().


> +}
>
> +static void flush_memcg_workqueue(struct kmem_cache *s)
> +{
>         /*
>          * SLUB deactivates the kmem_caches through call_rcu_sched. Make
>          * sure all registered rcu callbacks have been invoked.
> @@ -858,10 +869,6 @@ static inline int shutdown_memcg_caches(
>  {
>         return 0;
>  }
> -
> -static inline void flush_memcg_workqueue(struct kmem_cache *s)
> -{
> -}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
>
>  void slab_kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *s)
> @@ -879,8 +886,6 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cach
>         if (unlikely(!s))
>                 return;
>
> -       flush_memcg_workqueue(s);
> -
>         get_online_cpus();
>         get_online_mems();
>
> @@ -890,6 +895,22 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cach
>         if (s->refcount)
>                 goto out_unlock;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> +       memcg_set_kmem_cache_dying(s);
> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
> +
> +       put_online_mems();
> +       put_online_cpus();
> +
> +       flush_memcg_workqueue(s);
> +
> +       get_online_cpus();
> +       get_online_mems();
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
> +#endif
> +
>         err = shutdown_memcg_caches(s);
>         if (!err)
>                 err = shutdown_cache(s);
>
>


--
Yours,
Muchun