[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200728132951.29459-1-dwagner@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:29:51 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] block: Use non _rcu version of list functions for tag_set_list
tag_set_list is only accessed under the tag_set_lock lock. There is
no need for using the _rcu list functions.
The _rcu list function were introduced to allow read access to the
tag_set_list protected under RCU, see 705cda97ee3a ("blk-mq: Make it
safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list") and
05b79413946d ("Revert "blk-mq: don't handle TAG_SHARED in restart"").
Those changes got reverted later but the cleanup commit missed a
couple of places to undo the changes.
Fixes: 97889f9ac24f ("blk-mq: remove synchronize_rcu() from blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set()"
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index e32cb0217135..14ee7506f32f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2792,7 +2792,7 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q)
struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
- list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list);
+ list_del(&q->tag_set_list);
if (list_is_singular(&set->tag_list)) {
/* just transitioned to unshared */
set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
@@ -2819,7 +2819,7 @@ static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
}
if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)
queue_set_hctx_shared(q, true);
- list_add_tail_rcu(&q->tag_set_list, &set->tag_list);
+ list_add_tail(&q->tag_set_list, &set->tag_list);
mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock);
}
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists