linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v32 3/6] ARM: defconfig: u8500: Add LP55XX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <372891d8-816e-f640-7356-90513f998702@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:38:38 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v32 3/6] ARM: defconfig: u8500: Add LP55XX_COMMON config
 flag

Russel and Linus

On 7/22/20 10:31 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> The dependencies for the LP55XX LED drivers have been updated so that
> the child devices (i.e. LP5521) now depends on the LP55XX_COMMON config
> flag as opposed to the device selecting the LP55XX_COMMON flag.  The
> LP55XX_COMMON needs to be set in the defconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig
> index 28dd7cf56048..dea599e1c17e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y
>   CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y
>   CONFIG_LEDS_LM3530=y
>   CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO=y
> +CONFIG_LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON=y
>   CONFIG_LEDS_LP5521=y
>   CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT=y
>   CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y


I missed adding you to the patch.

Can you kindly review this change?

Dan