lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y2n36868.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:11:43 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>,
        Pingfan Liu <piliu@...hat.com>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
        Kexec-ml <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pingfan Liu <piliu@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 08/11] ppc64/kexec_file: setup backup region for kdump kernel

Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c
> index a5c1442590b2..88408b17a7f6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c
> @@ -697,6 +699,69 @@ static int update_usable_mem_fdt(void *fdt, struct crash_mem *usable_mem)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * load_backup_segment - Locate a memory hole to place the backup region.
> + * @image:               Kexec image.
> + * @kbuf:                Buffer contents and memory parameters.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +static int load_backup_segment(struct kimage *image, struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
> +{
> +	void *buf;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Setup a segment for backup region */
> +	buf = vzalloc(BACKUP_SRC_SIZE);

This worried me initially, because we can't copy from physically
discontiguous pages in real mode.

But as you explained this buffer is not used for copying.

I think if you move the large comment below up here, it would be
clearer.


> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/purgatory/trampoline_64.S b/arch/powerpc/purgatory/trampoline_64.S
> index 464af8e8a4cb..d4b52961f592 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/purgatory/trampoline_64.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/purgatory/trampoline_64.S
> @@ -43,14 +44,38 @@ master:
>  	mr	%r17,%r3	/* save cpu id to r17 */
>  	mr	%r15,%r4	/* save physical address in reg15 */
>  
> +	bl	0f		/* Work out where we're running */
> +0:	mflr	%r18

I know you just moved it, but this should use:

	bcl	20, 31, $+4
	mflr	%r18

Which is a special form of branch and link that doesn't unbalance the
link stack in the chip.

> +	/*
> +	 * Copy BACKUP_SRC_SIZE bytes from BACKUP_SRC_START to
> +	 * backup_start 8 bytes at a time.
> +	 *
> +	 * Use r3 = dest, r4 = src, r5 = size, r6 = count
> +	 */
> +	ld	%r3,(backup_start - 0b)(%r18)
> +	cmpdi	%cr0,%r3,0

I prefer spaces or tabs between arguments, eg:

	cmpdi	%cr0, %r3, 0

> +	beq	80f		/* skip if there is no backup region */

Local labels will make this clearer I think. eg:

	beq	.Lskip_copy

> +	lis	%r5,BACKUP_SRC_SIZE@h
> +	ori	%r5,%r5,BACKUP_SRC_SIZE@l
> +	cmpdi	%cr0,%r5,0
> +	beq	80f		/* skip if copy size is zero */
> +	lis	%r4,BACKUP_SRC_START@h
> +	ori	%r4,%r4,BACKUP_SRC_START@l
> +	li	%r6,0
> +70:

.Lcopy_loop:

> +	ldx	%r0,%r6,%r4
> +	stdx	%r0,%r6,%r3
> +	addi	%r6,%r6,8
> +	cmpld	%cr0,%r6,%r5
> +	blt	70b

	blt	.Lcopy_loop

> +

.Lskip_copy:

> +80:
>  	or	%r3,%r3,%r3	/* ok now to high priority, lets boot */
>  	lis	%r6,0x1
>  	mtctr	%r6		/* delay a bit for slaves to catch up */
>  	bdnz	.		/* before we overwrite 0-100 again */


cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ