linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: restore proper dirty throttling when memory.high changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 08:07:09 -0700
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: restore proper dirty throttling when
 memory.high changes

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:53 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
>
> Commit 8c8c383c04f6 ("mm: memcontrol: try harder to set a new
> memory.high") inadvertently removed a callback to recalculate the
> writeback cache size in light of a newly configured memory.high limit.
>
> Without letting the writeback cache know about a potentially heavily
> reduced limit, it may permit too many dirty pages, which can cause
> unnecessary reclaim latencies or even avoidable OOM situations.
>
> This was spotted while reading the code, it hasn't knowingly caused
> any problems in practice so far.
>
> Fixes: 8c8c383c04f6 ("mm: memcontrol: try harder to set a new memory.high")
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>