linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] scsi: ufs-qcom: Fix schedule while atomic error in ufs_qcom_dump_dbg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:21:38 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
Cc:     asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
        hongwus@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        sh425.lee@...sung.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/8] scsi: ufs-qcom: Fix schedule while atomic error in
 ufs_qcom_dump_dbg_regs

Hi Avri,

On 2020-07-27 21:05, Avri Altman wrote:
>> Dumping testbus registers needs to sleep a bit intermittently as there 
>> are
>> too many of them. Skip them for those contexts where sleep is not 
>> allowed.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> index 7da27ee..7831b2b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> @@ -1651,13 +1651,16 @@ static void ufs_qcom_dump_dbg_regs(struct
>> ufs_hba *hba)
>>         ufshcd_dump_regs(hba, REG_UFS_SYS1CLK_1US, 16 * 4,
>>                          "HCI Vendor Specific Registers ");
>> 
>> -       /* sleep a bit intermittently as we are dumping too much data 
>> */
>>         ufs_qcom_print_hw_debug_reg_all(hba, NULL,
>> ufs_qcom_dump_regs_wrapper);
>> -       udelay(1000);
>> -       ufs_qcom_testbus_read(hba);
>> -       udelay(1000);
>> -       ufs_qcom_print_unipro_testbus(hba);
>> -       udelay(1000);
>> +
>> +       if (in_task()) {
>> +               /* sleep a bit intermittently as we are dumping too 
>> much data */
>> +               usleep_range(1000, 1100);
>> +               ufs_qcom_testbus_read(hba);
>> +               usleep_range(1000, 1100);
>> +               ufs_qcom_print_unipro_testbus(hba);
>> +               usleep_range(1000, 1100);
>> +       }
>>  }
> How about moving the intermittent sleep out of the check if preemption
> is disabled?
> And maybe then you need to switch back to uedlay?

I will just remove all the testbus prints in next version to save us 
time here.

Thanks,

Can Guo.