linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM5PR1201MB0139AC067DF7F2E2AB9FCC96E7730@DM5PR1201MB0139.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:24:42 +0000
From:   "RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO" 
        <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
        "Mukunda, Vijendar" <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        "Agrawal, Akshu" <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build rt5682

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

-----Original Message-----
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 5:48 PM
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>; RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
Cc: moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM... <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>; Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>; open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>; Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Mukunda, Vijendar <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>; Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>; Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build rt5682



On 7/28/20 7:07 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 06:59:50AM +0000, RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO wrote:
>
>> So Actually for rt5682 codec Now in 5.8 there are three flags :
>> SND_SOC_RT5682
>> SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C
>> SND_SOC_RT5682_SDW
>
>> But till 5.7.8 we have
>> SND_SOC_RT5682
>> SND_SOC_RT5682_SDW
>
>> So in our design we were using SND_SOC_RT5682 which build
>> snd_soc_rt5682.ko Creates the respective codec_dais as defined in
>> that .ko
>
>> If we use SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C we get snd_soc_rt5682_I2c.ko , it is not creating the expected codec_dai links.
>
> Could you be more specific about the way in which "it is not creating
> the expected codec_dai links" please?  What are you expecting to
> happen and what happens instead?  Do you see any error messages for example?
>
>> As there are three flags defined in codecs, I expect that previous
>> one which we were using(SND_SOC_RT5682) is not a wrong flag and I
>> expect to use
>> SND_SOC_RT5682 as it is still available.
>
> Given that the core module does not register with any bus it is
> difficult to see how that could possibly work - the core module
> doesn't contain a driver at all.  Have you tested this change?

I share Mark's point. Have you tested this change on top of Mark's tree, or only on top of the stable kernel?
Ok. I will drop that patch and send the other series.

Thanks,