[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200729191948.GZ3703480@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:19:48 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>
Cc: kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, fkostenzer@...e.at,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib: kunit: Convert test_sort to KUnit test
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 04:11:51PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote:
> This adds the conversion of the test_sort.c to KUnit test.
>
> Please apply this commit first (linux-kselftest/kunit-fixes):
> 3f37d14b8a3152441f36b6bc74000996679f0998 kunit: kunit_config: Fix parsing of CONFIG options with space
Looks like you mixed up commit message and changelog / comments.
> Code Style Documentation: [0]
>
> Fix these warnings Reported-by lkp@...el.com
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.data+0x4fc70): Section mismatch in reference from the variable sort_test_cases to the variable .init.text:sort_test
> The variable sort_test_cases references
> the variable __init sort_test
> If the reference is valid then annotate the
> variable with or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable
>
> WARNING: modpost: lib/sort_kunit.o(.data+0x11c): Section mismatch in reference from the variable sort_test_cases to the function .init.text:sort_test()
> The variable sort_test_cases references
> the function __init sort_test()
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Link: [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200620054944.167330-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#u
This should be in different order: Link, Reported-by, SoB.
Also [0] is unnecessary
> lib/{test_sort.c => sort_kunit.c} | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
Still opened question why kunit is a suffix? Can't we leave same name? Can't we
do it rather prefix?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists