[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200729205919.GB1236929@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:59:19 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/23] seq_file: switch over direct seq_read method calls
to seq_read_iter
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:09:13PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Needs some thought and maybe some cocci help from Julia, but that's way
> better than this brute force sed thing which results in malformed crap
> like this:
>
> static const struct file_operations debug_stats_fops = {
> .open = debug_stats_open,
> .read_iter = seq_read_iter,
> .llseek = seq_lseek,
> .release = single_release,
> };
>
> and proliferates the copy and paste voodoo programming.
Better copy and paste than templates, IMO; at least the former is
greppable; fucking DEFINE_..._ATRIBUTE is *NOT*, especially due
to the use of ##.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists