[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e23cfddd-e910-09a5-bdb0-6fcc14f59209@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:31:28 -0500
From: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: SVM: Modify intercept_exceptions to generic
intercepts
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 3:48 PM
> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@....com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>; Vitaly Kuznetsov
> <vkuznets@...hat.com>; Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>; Sean
> Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>; kvm list
> <kvm@...r.kernel.org>; Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>; the arch/x86
> maintainers <x86@...nel.org>; LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Ingo
> Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>; Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>; H . Peter Anvin
> <hpa@...or.com>; Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: SVM: Modify intercept_exceptions to
> generic intercepts
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:38 PM Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com> wrote:
> >
> > Modify intercept_exceptions to generic intercepts in vmcb_control_area.
> > Use the generic __set_intercept, __clr_intercept and __is_intercept to
> > set the intercept_exceptions bits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> > ---
>
> > @@ -52,6 +54,25 @@ enum {
> > INTERCEPT_DR5_WRITE,
> > INTERCEPT_DR6_WRITE,
> > INTERCEPT_DR7_WRITE,
> > + /* Byte offset 008h (Vector 2) */
> > + INTERCEPT_DE_VECTOR = 64 + DE_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_DB_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_BP_VECTOR = 64 + BP_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_OF_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_BR_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_UD_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_NM_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_DF_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_TS_VECTOR = 64 + TS_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_NP_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_SS_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_GP_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_PF_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_MF_VECTOR = 64 + MF_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_AC_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_MC_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_XM_VECTOR,
> > + INTERCEPT_VE_VECTOR,
> > };
>
> I think it's demanding a lot of the reader to know where there are and are not
> gaps in the allocated hardware exception vectors. Perhaps all of the above
> enumeration definitions could have initializers? Either way...
Sure. Will add all the initializers here. Thanks
>
> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists