[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200729222341.GA684483@rani.riverdale.lan>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:23:41 -0400
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Golovin <dima@...ovin.in>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl@...rceware.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next v5 0/7] x86/boot: Remove run-time relocations from
compressed kernel
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:04:43PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 04:17:54PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > Same as v5 previously posted, but rebased onto next-20200717.
> >
> > v5: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200715004133.1430068-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu/
>
> BTW, some bits of feedback on process:
>
> - please don't re-use version numbers, this is confusing :)
This was a special case as there were no actual changes in this version.
> - please fix whatever is happening with the "In-Reply-To:" headers, the
> threading is extremely hard to understand (each patch isn't a reply to
> the cover letter, and everything is a reply to a single earlier email)
>
> --
> Kees Cook
I think this is because I'm passing --in-reply-to to format-patch.
Seems like I should specify that in send-email instead, hopefully that
will fix the threading.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists