[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3DCA0A88-0890-49EE-8644-E6311E891C55@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:59:37 -0700
From: Mark D Rustad <mrustad@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>, dvhart@...radead.org,
andy@...radead.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] mfd: Intel Platform Monitoring Technology support
at 12:58 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> If you do:
>
> do {
> int pos;
>
> pos = pci_find_next_ext_capability(pdev, pos, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_DVSEC);
> if (!pos)
> break;
>
> Then you can invoke pci_find_next_ext_capability() once, no?
Part of your suggestion here won't work, because pos needs to be
initialized to 0 the first time. As such it needs to be declared and
initialized outside the loop. Other than that it may be ok.
--
Mark Rustad, MRustad@...il.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (874 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists