[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200729072145.ifzoe656sjpxdior@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:21:45 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Roy Im <roy.im.opensource@...semi.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Pascal PAILLET-LME <p.paillet@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 3/3] Input: new da7280 haptic driver
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:36:38PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > v9:
> > - Removed the header file and put the definitions into the c file.
> > - Updated the pwm code and error logs with %pE
>
> I believe the %pE is to format an escaped buffer, you probably want to
> %pe (lowercase) to print errors. I am also not quite sure if we want to
> use it in cases when we have non-pointer error, or we should stick with
> %d as most of the kernel does.
compared with %d %pe is easier to understand as it emits "-ETIMEOUT"
instead of "-110". And yes, %pE is wrong.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists