[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159601213589.1360974.3536496595430081422@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 01:42:15 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Daniel Campello <campello@...omium.org>,
LKML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Daniel Campello <campello@...omium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Enrico Granata <egranata@...omium.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/14] iio: sx9310: Simplify error return handling
Quoting Daniel Campello (2020-07-28 16:05:16)
> Checks for non-zero return values to signal error conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Campello <campello@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
The mutex_lock, unlock, wait, lock, check wait, unlock sequence can be
improved in another patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists