lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:50:34 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Daniel Campello <campello@...omium.org>,
        LKML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Campello <campello@...omium.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Enrico Granata <egranata@...omium.org>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] sx9310 iio driver updates

Quoting Daniel Campello (2020-07-28 16:05:06)
> The first patch resends the DT binding for the driver that was merged in
> v5.8-rc1 with a small change to update for proper regulators. The second
> through the eleventh patch fixes several issues dropped from v8 to v9
> when the initial patch was merged. The twelveth patch fixes a few
> printks that are missing newlines and should be totally non-trivial to
> apply. The thirteenth patch drops channel_users because it's unused. The
> final patch adds support to enable the svdd and vdd supplies so that
> this driver can work on a board where the svdd supply isn't enabled at
> boot and needs to be turned on before this driver starts to communicate
> with the chip.

Can you please send this as not an in-reply-to the previous series? My
inbox has a hard time realizing that this is a new patch series.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists