[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200729105157.6acksxuzjdno5omq@vireshk-mac-ubuntu>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:21:57 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH][next] greybus: Use fallthrough
pseudo-keyword
On 28-07-20, 17:37, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 7/27/20 1:32 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with
> > the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1].
> >
> > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through
>
> Thanks for the patch. It looks good, but it raises
> another question I'd like discussion on.
>
> It seems that Johan likes default (or final) cases in
> switch statements without a "break" statement. Viresh
> and Bryan appear to be fond of this too.
>
> It's pedantic, but I don't like that. Am I wrong?
> --> Johan/Viresh/Bryan would you please comment?
I am not fond of them as they aren't required for the working of the code. It is
a bit like using an empty return statement for a routine with void return type,
though it surely adds some consistency to the switch case.
But if people really feel it must be there, then its fine :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists