[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159602415518.4006.7694548797042272636.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:02:35 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Qais Yousef" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/uclamp: Fix a deadlock when enabling uclamp
static key
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: e65855a52b479f98674998cb23b21ef5a8144b04
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/e65855a52b479f98674998cb23b21ef5a8144b04
Author: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:03:47 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:51:47 +02:00
sched/uclamp: Fix a deadlock when enabling uclamp static key
The following splat was caught when setting uclamp value of a task:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:49
cpus_read_lock+0x68/0x130
static_key_enable+0x1c/0x38
__sched_setscheduler+0x900/0xad8
Fix by ensuring we enable the key outside of the critical section in
__sched_setscheduler()
Fixes: 46609ce22703 ("sched/uclamp: Protect uclamp fast path code with static key")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200716110347.19553-4-qais.yousef@arm.com
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 6782534..e44d83f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1346,6 +1346,15 @@ static int uclamp_validate(struct task_struct *p,
if (upper_bound > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * We have valid uclamp attributes; make sure uclamp is enabled.
+ *
+ * We need to do that here, because enabling static branches is a
+ * blocking operation which obviously cannot be done while holding
+ * scheduler locks.
+ */
+ static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1376,8 +1385,6 @@ static void __setscheduler_uclamp(struct task_struct *p,
if (likely(!(attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP)))
return;
- static_branch_enable(&sched_uclamp_used);
-
if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MIN) {
uclamp_se_set(&p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN],
attr->sched_util_min, true);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists