[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200729122236.17418-1-prarit@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:22:36 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: corbet@....net, pmladek@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com
Cc: chunyan.zhang@...soc.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, orsonzhai@...il.com,
zhang.lyra@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13] printk: Add monotonic, boottime, and realtime timestamps
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
>
> printk.time=1/CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=1 adds a unmodified local hardware clock
> timestamp to printk messages. The local hardware clock loses time each
> day making it difficult to determine exactly when an issue has occurred in
> the kernel log, and making it difficult to determine how kernel and
> hardware issues relate to each other in real time.
>
> Make printk output different timestamps by adding options for no
> timestamp, the local hardware clock, the monotonic clock, the boottime
> clock, and the real clock. Allow a user to pick one of the clocks by
> using the printk.time kernel parameter. Output the type of clock in
> /sys/module/printk/parameters/time so userspace programs can interpret the
> timestamp.
>
> v13: This patch seems have being forgotten for 3 years. Rebase it on
> the latest kernel v5.8, reolve conflicts and fix compiling errors.
> Change code to adapt new printk_time usage.
> Petr's concern on printk_time is addressed by current version of kernel, too.
Lyra,
Copying a reply I sent to Orson who sent me this patch privately this
morning with some additional information.
ISTR the reason that this was dropped was because of the a problem with
the way systemd read the kernel's timestamps. It got the attention of
Linus, and it was then pulled from the tree.
I need to go back and review the entire thread as it's been several years
since we had the discussion although ISTR someone mentioning that doing two
timestamps would not be a problem for systemd.
For example,
[48551.015086]
would be
[48551.015086] m[xxxx.xxxx]
for the monotonic clock timestamp, and
[48551.015086] b[xxxx.xxxx]
for the boottime clock, etc.
P.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists