linux-kernel - Re: Minor RST rant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:44:45 +0200
From:   peterz@...radead.org
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Minor RST rant

On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:46:55AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:

>  Constant names stand out least effectively by themselves.  In
>  kernel-doc comments they are preceded by a '%'.  Would that make the
>  text more readable for you?  Does our doc infrastructure honour that in
>  .rst documents?

It does not. It also still reads really weird.

And for some reason firefox chokes on the HTML file I tried it with, and
make htmldocs takes for bloody ever.

Give me a plain text file, please. All this modern crap just doesn't
work.