linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: SVM: nested: Don't allocate VMCB structures on stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200729151454.GB27751@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:14:55 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: SVM: nested: Don't allocate VMCB structures on
 stack

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:22:31PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> 
> Do not allocate a vmcb_control_area and a vmcb_save_area on the stack,
> as these structures will become larger with future extenstions of
> SVM and thus the svm_set_nested_state() function will become a too large
> stack frame.

Speaking of too large, would it be overly paranoid to add:

  BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct vmcb_control_area) + sizeof(struct vmcb_save_area) <
	       KVM_STATE_NESTED_SVM_VMCB_SIZE)

More so for documentation than for any real concern that the SVM architecture
will do something silly, e.g. to make it obvious that patch 2 in this series
won't break backwards compatibility.
 
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> index 61378a3c2ce4..f3c3c4e1ca7f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> @@ -1061,8 +1061,9 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
>  	struct vmcb __user *user_vmcb = (struct vmcb __user *)
>  		&user_kvm_nested_state->data.svm[0];
> -	struct vmcb_control_area ctl;
> -	struct vmcb_save_area save;
> +	struct vmcb_control_area *ctl;
> +	struct vmcb_save_area *save;
> +	int ret;
>  	u32 cr0;
>  
>  	if (kvm_state->format != KVM_STATE_NESTED_FORMAT_SVM)
> @@ -1096,13 +1097,22 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	if (kvm_state->size < sizeof(*kvm_state) + KVM_STATE_NESTED_SVM_VMCB_SIZE)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	if (copy_from_user(&ctl, &user_vmcb->control, sizeof(ctl)))
> -		return -EFAULT;
> -	if (copy_from_user(&save, &user_vmcb->save, sizeof(save)))
> -		return -EFAULT;
>  
> -	if (!nested_vmcb_check_controls(&ctl))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	ret  = -ENOMEM;
> +	ctl  = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctl),  GFP_KERNEL);
> +	save = kzalloc(sizeof(*save), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ctl || !save)
> +		goto out_free;
> +
> +	ret = -EFAULT;
> +	if (copy_from_user(ctl, &user_vmcb->control, sizeof(ctl)))

The sizeof() calc is wrong, this is now calculating the size of the pointer,
not the size of the struct.  It'd need to be sizeof(*ctl).

> +		goto out_free;
> +	if (copy_from_user(save, &user_vmcb->save, sizeof(save)))

Same bug here.

> +		goto out_free;
> +
> +	ret = -EINVAL;
> +	if (!nested_vmcb_check_controls(ctl))
> +		goto out_free;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Processor state contains L2 state.  Check that it is
> @@ -1110,15 +1120,15 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 */
>  	cr0 = kvm_read_cr0(vcpu);
>          if (((cr0 & X86_CR0_CD) == 0) && (cr0 & X86_CR0_NW))
> -                return -EINVAL;
> +                goto out_free;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Validate host state saved from before VMRUN (see
>  	 * nested_svm_check_permissions).
>  	 * TODO: validate reserved bits for all saved state.
>  	 */
> -	if (!(save.cr0 & X86_CR0_PG))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (!(save->cr0 & X86_CR0_PG))
> +		goto out_free;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * All checks done, we can enter guest mode.  L1 control fields
> @@ -1127,15 +1137,21 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * contains saved L1 state.
>  	 */
>  	copy_vmcb_control_area(&hsave->control, &svm->vmcb->control);
> -	hsave->save = save;
> +	hsave->save = *save;
>  
>  	svm->nested.vmcb = kvm_state->hdr.svm.vmcb_pa;
> -	load_nested_vmcb_control(svm, &ctl);
> +	load_nested_vmcb_control(svm, ctl);
>  	nested_prepare_vmcb_control(svm);
>  
>  out_set_gif:
>  	svm_set_gif(svm, !!(kvm_state->flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_GIF_SET));
> -	return 0;
> +
> +	ret = 0;
> +out_free:
> +	kfree(save);
> +	kfree(ctl);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  struct kvm_x86_nested_ops svm_nested_ops = {
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>