| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_8bE8Qo5-0MA9J1gcEbN4DP=Wf2O6vOUVos=VkoODeayA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:38:34 +0800
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To: Neal Liu <neal.liu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] soc: mediatek: add mtk-devapc driver
Hi, Neal:
Neal Liu <neal.liu@...iatek.com> 於 2020年7月29日 週三 下午4:29寫道：
>
> MediaTek bus fabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> masters.
> The security violation is logged and sent to the processor for
> further analysis or countermeasures.
>
> Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and
> it will be handled by mtk-devapc driver. The violation
> information is printed in order to find the murderer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@...iatek.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +static int get_shift_group(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
> +{
> + u32 vio_shift_sta;
> + void __iomem *reg;
> +
> + reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_shift_sta;
> + vio_shift_sta = readl(reg);
> +
> + if (vio_shift_sta)
> + return __ffs(vio_shift_sta);
> +
> + return -EIO;
> +}
get_shift_group() is a small function, I would like to merge this
function into sync_vio_dbg() to make code more simple.
> +
[snip]
> +
> +#define PHY_DEVAPC_TIMEOUT 0x10000
> +
> +/*
> + * sync_vio_dbg - do "shift" mechansim" to get full violation information.
> + * shift mechanism is depends on devapc hardware design.
> + * Mediatek devapc set multiple slaves as a group. When violation
> + * is triggered, violation info is kept inside devapc hardware.
> + * Driver should do shift mechansim to "shift" full violation
> + * info to VIO_DBGs registers.
> + *
> + */
> +static int sync_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx, u32 shift_bit)
> +{
> + void __iomem *pd_vio_shift_sta_reg;
> + void __iomem *pd_vio_shift_sel_reg;
> + void __iomem *pd_vio_shift_con_reg;
> + int ret;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_shift_sta;
> + pd_vio_shift_sel_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_shift_sel;
> + pd_vio_shift_con_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_shift_con;
> +
> + /* Enable shift mechansim */
> + writel(0x1 << shift_bit, pd_vio_shift_sel_reg);
> + writel(0x1, pd_vio_shift_con_reg);
> +
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(pd_vio_shift_con_reg, val, val == 0x3, 0,
> + PHY_DEVAPC_TIMEOUT);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(ctx->dev, "%s: Shift violation info failed\n", __func__);
> +
> + /* Disable shift mechanism */
> + writel(0x0, pd_vio_shift_con_reg);
> + writel(0x0, pd_vio_shift_sel_reg);
> + writel(0x1 << shift_bit, pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
[snip]
> +
> +/*
> + * devapc_extract_vio_dbg - extract full violation information after doing
> + * shift mechanism.
> + */
> +static void devapc_extract_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
> +{
> + const struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs *vio_dbgs;
> + struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info;
> + void __iomem *vio_dbg0_reg;
> + void __iomem *vio_dbg1_reg;
> + u32 dbg0;
> +
> + vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_dbg0;
> + vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_dbg1;
> +
> + vio_dbgs = ctx->vio_dbgs;
> + vio_info = ctx->vio_info;
> +
> + /* Starts to extract violation information */
> + dbg0 = readl(vio_dbg0_reg);
> + vio_info->vio_addr = readl(vio_dbg1_reg);
> +
> + vio_info->master_id = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->mstid.mask) >>
> + vio_dbgs->mstid.start;
What is master_id? How could we use it to debug? For example, if we
get a master_id = 1, what should we do for this?
> + vio_info->domain_id = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->dmnid.mask) >>
> + vio_dbgs->dmnid.start;
What is domain_id? How could we use it to debug? For example, if we
get a domain_id = 2, what should we do for this?
> + vio_info->write = ((dbg0 & vio_dbgs->vio_w.mask) >>
> + vio_dbgs->vio_w.start) == 1;
> + vio_info->read = ((dbg0 & vio_dbgs->vio_r.mask) >>
> + vio_dbgs->vio_r.start) == 1;
> + vio_info->vio_addr_high = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->addr_h.mask) >>
> + vio_dbgs->addr_h.start;
What is vio_addr_high? As I know all register address are 32 bits, is
vio_addr_high the address above 32 bits?
> +
> + devapc_vio_info_print(ctx);
> +}
> +
[snip]
> +
> +/*
> + * devapc_violation_irq - the devapc Interrupt Service Routine (ISR) will dump
> + * violation information including which master violates
> + * access slave.
> + */
> +static irqreturn_t devapc_violation_irq(int irq_number,
> + struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
> +{
> + u32 vio_idx;
> +
> + /*
> + * Mask slave's irq before clearing vio status.
> + * Must do it to avoid nested interrupt and prevent
> + * unexpected behavior.
> + */
> + for (vio_idx = 0; vio_idx < ctx->vio_idx_num; vio_idx++)
> + mask_module_irq(ctx, vio_idx, true);
I would like to rewrite this for-loop as below to prevent too many
function call in irq handler.
for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->vio_idx_num); i++)
writel(0xffffffff, ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_mask + 4 * i);
reg = readl(ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_mask + 4 * i);
reg |= 1 << (ctx->vio_idx_num - 32 * i + 1) - 1;
writel(reg, ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_mask + 4 * i);
> +
> + devapc_dump_vio_dbg(ctx);
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure that violation info are written
> + * before further operations
> + */
> + smp_mb();
> +
> + for (vio_idx = 0; vio_idx < ctx->vio_idx_num; vio_idx++) {
> + clear_vio_status(ctx, vio_idx);
> + mask_module_irq(ctx, vio_idx, false);
> + }
Ditto for this for-loop.
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
[snip]
> +
> +static int mtk_devapc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx;
> + struct clk *devapc_infra_clk;
> + u32 devapc_irq;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(node))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ctx = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ctx = (struct mtk_devapc_context *)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + ctx->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + ctx->vio_info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct mtk_devapc_vio_info),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctx->vio_info)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ctx->devapc_pd_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + if (!ctx->devapc_pd_base)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + devapc_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> + if (!devapc_irq)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + devapc_infra_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "devapc-infra-clock");
> + if (IS_ERR(devapc_infra_clk))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (clk_prepare_enable(devapc_infra_clk))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, devapc_irq,
> + (irq_handler_t)devapc_violation_irq,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE, "devapc", ctx);
> + if (ret)
You should clk_disable_unprepare(devapc_infra_clk);
> + return ret;
> +
> + start_devapc(ctx);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_devapc_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
Ditto.
Regards,
Chun-Kuang.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver mtk_devapc_driver = {
> + .probe = mtk_devapc_probe,
> + .remove = mtk_devapc_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> + .of_match_table = mtk_devapc_dt_match,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(mtk_devapc_driver);
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists