[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200729170516.GA3059951@xps15>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:05:16 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, ohad@...ery.com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: virtio: support sharing vdev buffer
Hi Peng,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:15:43PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Support sharing vdev buffer between multiple vdevs by using name
> "vdevbuffer".
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> index dfd3808c34fd..5d78ebea111e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> @@ -343,6 +343,8 @@ int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
>
> /* Try to find dedicated vdev buffer carveout */
> mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
> + if (!mem)
> + mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdevbuffer");
We already have a way to share buffers [1], do you think it would work for you? I
would rather proceed that way to avoid introducing a 3rd way to deal with vdev
buffers.
Thanks,
Mathieu
[1]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.8-rc4/source/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c#L389
> if (mem) {
> phys_addr_t pa;
>
> --
> 2.16.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists