linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 2/2] remoteproc: core: Register the character device interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:40:01 -0700
From:   Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@...eaurora.org>
To:     agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, ohad@...ery.com,
        corbet@....net
Cc:     Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, tsoni@...eaurora.org,
        psodagud@...eaurora.org, rishabhb@...eaurora.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] remoteproc: core: Register the character device interface

Add the character device during rproc_add. This would create
a character device node at /dev/remoteproc<index>. Userspace
applications can interact with the remote processor using this
interface.

Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@...eaurora.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 277d3bf..7f90eee 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1986,6 +1986,11 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
 	/* create debugfs entries */
 	rproc_create_debug_dir(rproc);
 
+	/* add char device for this remoteproc */
+	ret = rproc_char_device_add(rproc);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
 	/*
 	 * Remind ourselves the remote processor has been attached to rather
 	 * than booted by the remoteproc core.  This is important because the
@@ -2262,6 +2267,7 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
 	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
 
 	rproc_delete_debug_dir(rproc);
+	rproc_char_device_remove(rproc);
 
 	/* the rproc is downref'ed as soon as it's removed from the klist */
 	mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
@@ -2430,6 +2436,7 @@ static int __init remoteproc_init(void)
 {
 	rproc_init_sysfs();
 	rproc_init_debugfs();
+	rproc_init_cdev();
 	rproc_init_panic();
 
 	return 0;
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project