[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8EDC210B-0A0F-4FAC-B008-303CE2D65A26@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:41:34 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Michael S.Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] mm/page_isolation: don't dump_page(NULL) in set_migratetype_isolate()
> Am 29.07.2020 um 20:36 schrieb Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>:
>
> On 7/29/20 11:08 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> I have no clue what you mean with "reintroducing this abandoning of
>> pageblocks". All this patch is changing is not doing the dump_page() -
>> or am I missing something important?
>
> My apologies!!!
>
No worries, thanks for reviewing!!
> I got confused when I saw 'Return -EBUSY' removed from the comment and
> assumed the code would not return an error code. The code now more
> explicitly does return -EBUSY. My concern was when I incorrectly thought
> you were removing the error return code. Sorry for the noise.
>
> Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> --
> Mike Kravetz
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists