linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: iproc: Set affinity mask on MSI interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ddef93f0-4f5b-f860-bc2e-96ccc84ad040@broadcom.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:45:19 -0700
From:   Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
To:     Mark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, rjui@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: iproc: Set affinity mask on MSI interrupts



On 7/29/2020 8:37 PM, Mark Tomlinson wrote:
> The core interrupt code expects the irq_set_affinity call to update the
> effective affinity for the interrupt. This was not being done, so update
> iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity() to do so.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
> index 3176ad3ab0e5..908475d27e0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c
> @@ -209,15 +209,20 @@ static int iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
>  	struct iproc_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>  	int target_cpu = cpumask_first(mask);
>  	int curr_cpu;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	curr_cpu = hwirq_to_cpu(msi, data->hwirq);
>  	if (curr_cpu == target_cpu)
> -		return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
> +		ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
> +	else {
> +		/* steer MSI to the target CPU */
> +		data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu;
> +		ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
> +	}
>  
> -	/* steer MSI to the target CPU */
> -	data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu;
> +	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(target_cpu));
>  
> -	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void iproc_msi_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data,
> 

This change looks good to me. Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>